Grass-roots activists and local zoning seem to align against a plan to build a gymnasium in Turbot Township. Residents say a proposed gymnastics center would bring increased traffic, water and sewer use. Further, the plan does not seem to comply with the current agricultural zoning in the area.
Grass-roots activism is generally laudable -- our rights of freedom of speech and assembly would be squandered if residents did not rally together in common causes. Likewise, zoning is an important tool for local and county governments. Case closed, right?
Not so fast. Economic and population growth are driving more people and businesses into portions of the Valley that were long reserved for farming. Farmers require the protection of zoning so that their vital role of food production is not compromised. However, elected officials may need to rethink how much of a municipality ought to be set aside for agricultural practices.
A day after the closing ceremony of the Beijing Olympics, one resident stood among a crowd of protesters at a Turbot Township meeting and defended the planned gymnastics center. "I think it's a positive thing," Janet Yordy said. "There's not a lot of things for kids to do. It's a wonderful opportunity for the Milton area."
Children inspired by the medal-winning exploits of Nastia Liukin and Shawn Johnson could benefit from access to a training center close to their home.
Officials at the proposed gymnastic center said as many as 24 students would receive training at the center each day.
Turbot Township zoning officials have yet to rule on the proposal. The letter of the law may suggest they should reject the gymnasium plan; to do otherwise may seem like spot zoning. However, establishing a place to help children exercise and begin the pursuit of their Olympic dreams might be one of those rare cases when bending the rules seems acceptable.
