If there were a hall of fame for pointless studies, the recent University of Pittsburgh inquiry into head injuries and motorcycle riders would be a sure inductee.
It is not that the topic is pointless. It is just that the results should be obvious to anyone whose un-helmeted head has not bounced off a highway.
Those results show (no drum roll needed) that since Pennsylvania repealed its helmet law for motorcycle riders, head injuries among those riders have risen 60 percent.
If the lawmakers, lobbyists and riders who worked hard to repeal the bill in 2003 were honest, they would say they knew that would happen. They knew more people would be hurt, yet they repealed the law anyway.
Which brings us to the question, How far should government go to protect people from themselves? In an America that still believes in that "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" line, government indeed should play as hands-off as possible, even if those happy pursuits involve a high risk of traumatic head injury and/or death.
That leaves it up to the people to inform themselves about the issue and make the smart choice.
The facts are clear: Helmets do not prevent all injuries in motorcycle crashes. Not even Kevlar-encased bubble wrap safety suits would do that. But there is no question that helmets do reduce the number and severity of head injuries in motorcycle mishaps.
Only the most hard-core live-fast-and-die-young types would argue that unprotected riding is a good idea.
The Pittsburgh study has disproved the free-riding propaganda that un-helmeted riders are somehow safer than their hard-hat counterparts.
Maybe there was a point to the study after all.
Opinion
Pointless helmet study may have a point
- Opinion
-
-
Good-paying jobs
I am writing in response to comments made by several lawmakers and certain media regarding people receiving unemployment compensation not searching for employment but only wanting extensions.
-
Economy is tough but still pay rises
It was my first time attending a Lewisburg School Board meeting last night. I went to hear public comment on the Boards recent decision to extend the Superintendents contract, which included a 20-plus percent pay raise.
-
Sunbury has a lot to offer
I would like to respond to the letter writer that inferred that Sunbury was a pretty package with nothing inside.
-
Mutual aid is necessary
Mutual aid agreements in local law enforcement strike at the heart of basic small-town decency. When a neighbor is in need, those equipped to help ought to drop everything and spring to aid.
-
Lifting me higher
I am not a winner of a Pulitzer Prize, nor am I an author of best selling novels, I'm just a human being attempting to live life here on earth with purpose and I can find no greater way to do that than through my faith and my belief in God.
-
Understaffing
I read with interest your article regarding police mutual aid in Northumberland County.
-
Carney, Marino ought to get focused on issues
U.S. Rep. Chris Carney and Tom Marino ought to focus on the issues in the upcoming campaign for Congress.
-
Blatantly unfair
The Pennsylvania Republican Party is supporting an effort to strike third-party candidates from the general election ballot in November.
-
Fiscal responsibility
This editorial letter is only the second such letter I have been moved to pen in my lifetime.
-
Schools need a little help from home
Milton High School failed to meet its adequate yearly progress under Pennsylvania's version of the federal No Child Left Behind because one student did not show up for the standardized test.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Good-paying jobs
